<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://do-or-do-not.com/content/proof/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://do-or-do-not.com/content/proof</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmy B</title>
		<link>http://do-or-do-not.com/content/proof/comment-page-1#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 19:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thunderdog.com/?p=265#comment-387</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oops.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Got so excited to read some actual script that I merely glanced at most of your original post. Y&#039;know, the part where you explained that there wasn&#039;t much in the way of scene directions and about the characters&#039; reactions in some places.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So...oops.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.</p>

<p>Got so excited to read some actual script that I merely glanced at most of your original post. Y&#8217;know, the part where you explained that there wasn&#8217;t much in the way of scene directions and about the characters&#8217; reactions in some places.</p>

<p>So&#8230;oops.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://do-or-do-not.com/content/proof/comment-page-1#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 19:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thunderdog.com/?p=265#comment-386</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Timmy, thanks much for your comments.  And yeah, most of what you pointed out is stuff that will be fixed later.  But to address a couple of your points head-on:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;1. Overall, it’s a little chatty. Not a lot, though, and with the right artist it won’t appear as talkative.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think part of the reason it comes off as chatty is because, as you indicate later, I don&#039;t have much in the way of &quot;stage direction&quot; in here just yet -- putting that stuff in at this stage would&#039;ve killed my forward momentum, so I skipped most of it for now.  But I have a feeling that, even if I had more direction in there, it&#039;d likely still come off as chatty.  I tend to be dialogue-driven, so I don&#039;t think there&#039;s going to be any way around the chattiness.  I think I&#039;ll fall right in the Mamet-Sorkin-Bendis school of writing (not comparing myself to them just yet, just sayin&#039; they&#039;re obvious influences).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;2. Speaking of visuals, will there be more direction in later drafts as to setting: time of day, “set descriptions&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timmy, thanks much for your comments.  And yeah, most of what you pointed out is stuff that will be fixed later.  But to address a couple of your points head-on:</p>

<p><em>1. Overall, it’s a little chatty. Not a lot, though, and with the right artist it won’t appear as talkative.</em></p>

<p>I think part of the reason it comes off as chatty is because, as you indicate later, I don&#8217;t have much in the way of &#8220;stage direction&#8221; in here just yet &#8212; putting that stuff in at this stage would&#8217;ve killed my forward momentum, so I skipped most of it for now.  But I have a feeling that, even if I had more direction in there, it&#8217;d likely still come off as chatty.  I tend to be dialogue-driven, so I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s going to be any way around the chattiness.  I think I&#8217;ll fall right in the Mamet-Sorkin-Bendis school of writing (not comparing myself to them just yet, just sayin&#8217; they&#8217;re obvious influences).</p>

<p><em>2. Speaking of visuals, will there be more direction in later drafts as to setting: time of day, “set descriptions</em></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmy B.</title>
		<link>http://do-or-do-not.com/content/proof/comment-page-1#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 19:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thunderdog.com/?p=265#comment-385</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What I like about this scene right off the bat is that it feels like &lt;b&gt;something&lt;/b&gt;. This isn’t some exercise you’re doing to keep sharp; rather, it’s a story that you’ve just to get down on paper. That’s what writers do, and they do it because they have to.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is a first draft, so there’s obviously some nits you need picked, so I have these:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Overall, it’s a little chatty. Not a lot, though, and with the right artist it won’t appear as talkative.  I understand that the scene isn’t something you can cut a lot of dialogue from, as there’s a need for some introductions and not a whole lot happening visually.  It’s not so wordy as to be distracting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Speaking of visuals, will there be more direction in later drafts as to setting: time of day, “set descriptions&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I like about this scene right off the bat is that it feels like <b>something</b>. This isn’t some exercise you’re doing to keep sharp; rather, it’s a story that you’ve just to get down on paper. That’s what writers do, and they do it because they have to.</p>

<p>This is a first draft, so there’s obviously some nits you need picked, so I have these:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Overall, it’s a little chatty. Not a lot, though, and with the right artist it won’t appear as talkative.  I understand that the scene isn’t something you can cut a lot of dialogue from, as there’s a need for some introductions and not a whole lot happening visually.  It’s not so wordy as to be distracting.</p></li>
<li><p>Speaking of visuals, will there be more direction in later drafts as to setting: time of day, “set descriptions</p></li>
</ol>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://do-or-do-not.com/content/proof/comment-page-1#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 03:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thunderdog.com/?p=265#comment-384</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, D!  More you shall get.  :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, D!  More you shall get.  :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight</title>
		<link>http://do-or-do-not.com/content/proof/comment-page-1#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 03:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thunderdog.com/?p=265#comment-383</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not bad, man. I want more.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not bad, man. I want more.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

